Asana vs TeamGantt 2026: Work Platform vs Pure-Gantt Specialist

Asana vs TeamGantt: what is the short answer?

Choose Asana when your priority is a broad work-management platform, with portfolios, many integrations, and several views around the schedule. Choose TeamGantt when your priority is an approachable Gantt-first tool, priced per account rather than per user, for a few active projects. Neither is universally better: the decisive questions are who needs to edit the schedule, whether critical path and baselines are required, and whether the surrounding workflow should be a focused scheduler or a broader work platform.

Checked on 18 October 2026: Prices and plan details below were checked against the vendors’ official pricing, product, and help pages. Prices are USD list prices for annual billing unless stated otherwise; taxes, promotions, regions, legacy plans, and negotiated contracts can differ.

How do Asana and TeamGantt compare now?

The table separates a visible timeline from formal schedule controls. A product can show dated bars while placing dependencies, critical path, or baseline comparison on a higher tier. That distinction matters more than whether a marketing page simply says “Gantt.”

Figures and their sources

Asana

Figure	Value	Source
Free plan (Personal)	Up to 2 users; no Timeline, Gantt or task dependencies	Asana pricing
Starter (Gantt and dependencies)	$10.99 per user per month billed annually, $13.49 monthly	Asana pricing
Critical path	Advanced and above, from $24.99 per user per month billed annually	Asana pricing
Rating	4.5 out of 5 from 13,764 reviews	GetApp

TeamGantt

Figure	Value	Source
Free plan (Personal)	1 user, 1 project, 40 tasks	TeamGantt pricing
Base plan	$59 per month for the account: 1 manager, 10 collaborators, 5 projects	TeamGantt pricing
Critical path	Included on every paid plan	TeamGantt pricing
Rating	4.6 out of 5 from 204 reviews	GetApp

Checked on 18 October 2026.

When is Asana the better choice?

Asana is the stronger fit when the priority is a broad work-management platform, with portfolios, many integrations, and several views around the schedule. Paid plans have no seat cap, Portfolios come with Advanced, and Asana lists 100+ free integrations.

The main qualification is equally important. Formal schedulers should account for the Advanced-tier critical-path gate: Starter shows the Gantt chart and dependencies, but not the critical path.

Choose Asana if: its surrounding workflow matters as much as the chart, its current plan limits match the real editor group, and the team has tested one representative project rather than comparing feature names alone.

When is TeamGantt the better choice?

TeamGantt is the stronger fit when the priority is an approachable Gantt-first tool, priced per account rather than per user, for a few active projects. Base includes 1 manager and 10 collaborators; Business includes unlimited managers and collaborators, with up to 500 tasks per project and 20 projects.

The tradeoff is not hidden. The plans are sized by projects and managers: Base allows 1 manager and 5 projects, each extra Business project costs $24 a month ($228 a year), and the 14-day trial requires a credit card.

Choose TeamGantt if: its pricing unit matches how the team works, its scheduling tier contains every required control, and the product’s collaboration model fits internal and external participants.

What does the price comparison look like for 10 people?

• Asana: For 10 paid users, Starter is $1,318.80/year. Advanced is $2,998.80/year and is the first tier with critical path.
• TeamGantt: A 10-person team with 1 schedule manager and up to 5 projects fits Base at $589/year, critical path included. Several managers move it to Business, from $1,140/year with 5 projects included.

Those figures are not automatically like-for-like. A free viewer, collaborator, guest, manager, or desktop user can have different permissions in each product. Compare the smallest group that must actually create tasks, change dates, restructure dependencies, and administer the schedule—not the total number of people who may open a link.

For procurement, model at least three cases: the current editor count, the editor count after one year, and the number of simultaneously active projects. Then confirm the result in each vendor’s checkout because seat minimums, project add-ons, and regional pricing can change the total.

Which product has the stronger Gantt scheduling model?

Asana: Timeline and Gantt views are included on Starter and higher plans. Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans, not on Personal. Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans. Check Asana’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy.

TeamGantt: The Gantt chart is the core of every plan, the free one included. Dependencies are included on every plan; advanced dependencies need Business or Builder Edition. Critical path is included on every paid plan: Base, Business, and Builder Edition. Check TeamGantt’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy.

A stronger schedule model is not always the better product. A team may rationally accept lighter Gantt controls in exchange for automation, documents, dashboards, or ecosystem fit. Conversely, a project manager who recalculates handoffs daily should not buy a broad platform merely because it can display a timeline.

What should you test before choosing?

1. Import or rebuild one real project with at least 30 tasks.
2. Create the dependency types the project actually uses, including lag if relevant.
3. Move a predecessor and confirm how successors react.
4. Display critical path and a baseline using the tier you intend to buy.
5. Invite one scheduler, one contributor, and one read-only stakeholder.
6. Export the schedule in the format your clients or PMO require.
7. Price the exact number of paid editors and active projects at checkout.

This test exposes permission, scale, and plan-limit differences that a marketing comparison cannot.

When is GanttFather a better fit than Asana or TeamGantt?

GanttFather fits a Gantt-first project with up to two editors and many reviewers. It is free for 1 project you own, with 2 editors and unlimited free viewers. Each extra project is US$5 a month (US$2.50 a month billed yearly), and an extra editor seat is US$2 a month (US$1 a month billed yearly). No feature is locked to a paid plan: FS/SS/FF/SF dependencies with lag and lead, critical path, Gantt, List, and Board views, Excel import and export, PDF and PNG reports, live updates, and an MCP server for AI assistants.

The limits: GanttFather has no baselines, no comments, and no resource leveling (workload is only a count of active tasks per person), it runs only in the browser, and dependencies are not part of its Excel import and export. Asana or TeamGantt can be the better purchase when those capabilities or a larger ecosystem outweigh the price difference.

Create a free GanttFather project and reproduce one dependency-heavy phase before deciding. For direct product pages, see GanttFather vs Asana and GanttFather vs TeamGantt.

Frequently asked questions

Is Asana or TeamGantt cheaper?

It depends on paid editors, active projects, and the feature tier. Asana: For 10 paid users, Starter is $1,318.80/year. Advanced is $2,998.80/year and is the first tier with critical path. TeamGantt: A 10-person team with 1 schedule manager and up to 5 projects fits Base at $589/year, critical path included. Several managers move it to Business, from $1,140/year with 5 projects included. Compare the exact checkout totals rather than multiplying a headline price that may use a different team-size band or project bundle.

Which one has a usable free Gantt chart?

Asana: Personal is free for up to 2 users, with unlimited tasks and projects, but it has no Timeline, Gantt, or task dependencies. TeamGantt: The free Personal plan covers 1 user, 1 project, and 40 tasks, with basic Gantt features including dependencies. “Free” should be evaluated with its usage, task, project, and collaboration limits—not just account creation.

Which one supports dependencies?

Asana: Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans, not on Personal. TeamGantt: Dependencies are included on every plan; advanced dependencies need Business or Builder Edition.

Which one supports critical path?

Asana: Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans. TeamGantt: Critical path is included on every paid plan: Base, Business, and Builder Edition.

Which one supports baselines?

Asana: Check Asana’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy. TeamGantt: Check TeamGantt’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy.

How should a team migrate between them?

Export the smallest representative project first, preserve a copy of the source data, and validate task hierarchy, dates, dependency types, lag, assignees, comments, and custom fields after import. No cross-vendor migration preserves every permission, automation, dashboard, or integration, so budget time for manual reconstruction and acceptance testing.

---

Sources

1. Asana, Pricing
2. Asana, Pricing feature table (plain text)
3. TeamGantt, Pricing