Asana vs TeamGantt 2026: Work Platform vs Pure-Gantt Specialist

Asana vs TeamGantt: what is the short answer?

Choose Asana when your priority is automations, forms, portfolios, goals, and multiple work views around the schedule. Choose TeamGantt when your priority is an approachable Gantt-first interface for a small, predictable active-project portfolio. Neither is universally better: the decisive questions are who needs to edit the schedule, whether critical path and baselines are required, and whether the surrounding workflow should be a focused scheduler or a broader work platform.

Verified August 7, 2026: Prices and plan packaging below were checked against the vendors’ official pricing and help pages. Prices are USD list prices for annual billing unless stated otherwise; taxes, promotions, regions, legacy plans, and negotiated contracts can differ.

How do Asana and TeamGantt compare now?

The table separates a visible timeline from formal schedule controls. A product can show dated bars while placing dependencies, critical path, or baseline comparison on a higher tier. That distinction matters more than whether a marketing page simply says “Gantt.”

When is Asana the better choice?

Asana is the stronger fit when the priority is automations, forms, portfolios, goals, and multiple work views around the schedule. Cloud collaboration, comments, rules, forms, and unlimited free guests on Starter make Asana a broad work-management platform.

Its current scheduling position is also clear: Separate Timeline and Gantt views are included on Starter and higher plans. Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans. Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans; Asana excludes subtasks and caps the calculation at 2,000 dated tasks.

The main qualification is equally important. Formal schedulers should account for the Advanced-tier critical-path gate, the single-baseline limit, and the fact that subtasks do not participate in critical-path calculation.

Choose Asana if: its surrounding workflow matters as much as the chart, its current plan limits match the real editor group, and the team has tested one representative project rather than comparing feature names alone.

When is TeamGantt the better choice?

TeamGantt is the stronger fit when the priority is an approachable Gantt-first interface for a small, predictable active-project portfolio. Basic includes 1 manager and 10 collaborators; Business includes unlimited managers and collaborators.

For schedule buyers, the current entitlement is: Gantt is the primary experience on every plan. Basic covers core scheduling; Business adds advanced dependency controls and other advanced scheduling features. Critical path is in the current Business feature group.

The tradeoff is not hidden. The current bundles have project, role, and task limits: Basic allows 150 tasks/project and Business 500; advanced controls require Business.

Choose TeamGantt if: its pricing unit matches how the team works, its scheduling tier contains every required control, and the product’s collaboration model fits internal and external participants.

What does the price comparison look like for 10 people?

• Asana: For 10 paid users, Starter is $1,318.80/year. Advanced is $2,998.80/year and is the first current tier with critical path.
• TeamGantt: A 10-person workflow with 1 schedule manager can fit Basic at $240/year. Multiple managers or critical path move the comparison to Business at $1,140/year.

Those figures are not automatically like-for-like. A free viewer, collaborator, guest, manager, or desktop user can have different permissions in each product. Compare the smallest group that must actually create tasks, change dates, restructure dependencies, and administer the schedule—not the total number of people who may open a link.

For procurement, model at least three cases: the current editor count, the editor count after one year, and the number of simultaneously active projects. Then confirm the result in each vendor’s checkout because seat buckets, project add-ons, and regional pricing can change the total.

Which product has the stronger Gantt scheduling model?

Asana: Separate Timeline and Gantt views are included on Starter and higher plans. Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans. Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans; Asana excludes subtasks and caps the calculation at 2,000 dated tasks. Gantt on Starter and higher plans supports one baseline per project; a new snapshot replaces the existing baseline.

TeamGantt: Gantt is the primary experience on every plan. Basic covers core scheduling; Business adds advanced dependency controls and other advanced scheduling features. Critical path is in the current Business feature group. Baseline and actual-versus-estimated controls are positioned with higher-tier scheduling features; verify the live matrix at checkout.

A stronger schedule model is not always the better product. A team may rationally accept lighter Gantt controls in exchange for automation, documents, dashboards, or ecosystem fit. Conversely, a project manager who recalculates handoffs daily should not buy a broad platform merely because it can display a timeline.

What should you test before choosing?

1. Import or rebuild one real project with at least 30 tasks.
2. Create the dependency types the project actually uses, including lag if relevant.
3. Move a predecessor and confirm how successors react.
4. Display critical path and a baseline using the tier you intend to buy.
5. Invite one scheduler, one contributor, and one read-only stakeholder.
6. Export the schedule in the format your clients or PMO require.
7. Price the exact number of paid editors and active projects at checkout.

This test exposes permission, scale, and plan-limit differences that a marketing comparison cannot.

When is GanttFather a better fit than Asana or TeamGantt?

GanttFather is the simpler cost pattern when a project needs a Gantt-first workspace, no more than two included editors, and many reviewers. The free tier includes one owned project, two editor seats, unlimited viewers and guests, FS/SS/FF/SF dependencies with lag, critical-path highlighting, Kanban, Excel import/export, real-time sharing, REST API access, and a native MCP server.

The limits should be explicit: GanttFather does not currently provide automatic resource leveling or a dedicated schedule-baseline overlay. Asana or TeamGantt can be the better purchase when those capabilities, a larger ecosystem, or their specialized workflow outweighs the price difference.

Create a free GanttFather project and reproduce one dependency-heavy phase before deciding. For direct product pages, see GanttFather vs Asana and GanttFather vs TeamGantt.

Frequently asked questions

Is Asana or TeamGantt cheaper?

It depends on paid editors, active projects, and the feature tier. For 10 paid users, Starter is $1,318.80/year. Advanced is $2,998.80/year and is the first current tier with critical path. A 10-person workflow with 1 schedule manager can fit Basic at $240/year. Multiple managers or critical path move the comparison to Business at $1,140/year. Compare the exact checkout totals rather than multiplying a headline price that may use a different team-size band or project bundle.

Which one has a usable free Gantt chart?

Asana: Personal is free for up to 2 users; it includes list, board, and calendar views, but not Timeline or Gantt. TeamGantt: Personal is free for 1 project with 40 tasks. “Free” should be evaluated with its usage, task, project, and collaboration limits—not just account creation.

Which one supports dependencies?

Asana: Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans. TeamGantt: Basic covers core scheduling; Business adds advanced dependency controls and other advanced scheduling features.

Which one supports critical path?

Asana: Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans; Asana excludes subtasks and caps the calculation at 2,000 dated tasks. TeamGantt: Critical path is in the current Business feature group.

Which one supports baselines?

Asana: Gantt on Starter and higher plans supports one baseline per project; a new snapshot replaces the existing baseline. TeamGantt: Baseline and actual-versus-estimated controls are positioned with higher-tier scheduling features; verify the live matrix at checkout.

How should a team migrate between them?

Export the smallest representative project first, preserve a copy of the source data, and validate task hierarchy, dates, dependency types, lag, assignees, comments, and custom fields after import. No cross-vendor migration preserves every permission, automation, dashboard, or integration, so budget time for manual reconstruction and acceptance testing.

---

Sources

1. Asana, Pricing
2. Asana Help, Gantt view
3. Asana Help, Critical path on Timeline
4. TeamGantt, Pricing
5. TeamGantt Support, Subscription options