Asana vs TeamGantt 2026: Work Platform vs Pure-Gantt Specialist

TL;DR: Asana vs TeamGantt in 2026

Asana is better when your team needs a broad work management platform — automation rules, OKR tracking, and 250+ integrations in a single subscription that covers tasks, boards, and timelines. TeamGantt is better when Gantt chart scheduling is your primary workflow and you want a purpose-built timeline tool with per-project pricing that doesn’t charge you per seat — especially if your team size varies or you bring in external collaborators. GanttFather is the third option when you need Gantt-first planning with free dependencies and critical path — flat per-project pricing with unlimited free viewers, never a per-seat bill.

At a glance: feature-by-feature comparison

Sources: pricing — asana.com/pricing, teamgantt.com/pricing (retrieved 2026-04-28).

When Asana is the better choice

Asana’s Rules engine is the clearest differentiator against TeamGantt. TeamGantt has no automation layer at any tier — every status change, assignment update, and notification requires manual action. Asana Starter at $10.99/user/month annual includes unlimited automations that can trigger across task fields, status updates, due dates, and custom field changes. For operations teams running repeating workflows — content calendars, sprint ceremonies, client onboarding — the difference is substantial time savings every week.

Asana also wins on collaboration breadth. Its Goals and Portfolios (Advanced tier) give leadership a single view connecting project-level work to company OKRs. The 250+ native integrations at Starter include Slack, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Jira, and Zoom — tools most teams already use. TeamGantt’s integration story is thin by comparison; even Procore connectivity is gated behind the Builder Edition at $99–$199/month. For teams embedded in a broader software stack, Asana is the practical choice.

For teams that use multiple views — Kanban, list, calendar, and timeline — Asana’s Starter tier includes all of them. TeamGantt’s Basic plan provides Gantt, calendar, and list, but Kanban is gated at Business ($19/project/month annual).

Pick Asana if: your team runs multi-step automations, tracks OKRs alongside projects, needs 250+ integrations, or uses Kanban and timeline views interchangeably.

When TeamGantt is the better choice

TeamGantt’s per-project pricing model is genuinely different from nearly every competitor. Rather than charging per seat, you pay per project — $10/project/month (annual) on Basic or $19/project/month (annual) on Business — and collaborators join at no additional cost. For teams with large or fluctuating headcounts — construction crews, agency client teams, volunteer committees — per-seat pricing can balloon quickly while per-project pricing stays predictable.

TeamGantt’s interface is also purpose-built for timeline planning in a way Asana’s is not. The Gantt view is the default experience, not one tab among many. Drag-and-drop scheduling, milestone markers, and progress bars are front and center from the first login. Teams that plan visually on a timeline will find the learning curve lower and the day-to-day interaction faster than Asana’s more menu-heavy interface.

At the Business tier ($19/project/month annual), TeamGantt adds dependencies, critical path, workload management, time tracking, and RACI assignments — a complete scheduling toolkit for project managers running deadline-driven work. For a team managing 3 active projects, that’s $57/month regardless of whether 5 or 50 people collaborate.

Pick TeamGantt if: your team plans primarily by Gantt chart, your collaborator count is large or unpredictable, and per-project pricing fits your budget better than per-seat.

Pricing reality check

For a 10-person team that needs Gantt, dependencies, and critical path:

• Asana Advanced: $24.99 × 10 users × 12 months = $2,998.80/year. This is the minimum Asana tier that includes critical path. The Starter tier ($1,318.80/year for 10 people) includes Timeline and dependencies but not critical path or time tracking.
• TeamGantt Business: $19/project/month (annual). For 3 projects with unlimited users: $19 × 3 × 12 = $684/year. For 10 projects: $19 × 10 × 12 = $2,280/year. Critical path, dependencies, and time tracking are all included. Collaborator count does not change the price.

The math shifts depending on project count versus team size. A 10-person team running 3 projects saves significantly with TeamGantt Business ($684/year) compared to Asana Advanced ($2,998.80/year). A small team running many projects could flip that calculation — at 13+ projects, TeamGantt Business exceeds Asana Advanced’s cost for 10 people.

Where Asana and TeamGantt both fall short — the Gantt-first gap

Asana’s Timeline view requires the Starter tier ($10.99/user/month annual), dependencies follow at the same tier, and critical path is locked behind Advanced ($24.99/user/month annual) — a three-tier journey just to reach the scheduling features that Gantt-first teams need on day one. TeamGantt solves the per-seat problem with project-based pricing, but its Business tier at $19/project/month still represents a recurring subscription that grows with your project portfolio, and there is no meaningful free tier — the free plan caps at one project, 40 tasks, and a single manager. Teams that want Gantt, dependencies, and critical path at zero cost — or at a flat rate that grows with projects rather than headcount — find both platforms ask for compromises before they can plan effectively.

The third option: GanttFather

GanttFather is built around the Gantt chart as the primary view, not an upsell. The free tier includes your first project with 2 editor seats and unlimited free viewers and guests, plus all dependency types (FS, SS, FF, SF + lag), critical path, Kanban, Excel round-trip import/export, and a native MCP server so AI agents can read and update your schedule directly. Extra projects you own are $5/month each ($30/year, 50% off) and every feature stays included — pricing grows with the projects you own, never with headcount. Viewers and guests are always free, and editing a project someone else owns costs nothing. If your team’s primary workflow is timeline planning and you want the full scheduling toolkit without a per-seat bill, GanttFather is the focused alternative.

• How GanttFather compares to Asana →
• How GanttFather compares to TeamGantt →
• See GanttFather pricing

For a direct look at how the two pure-Gantt specialists compare head to head, see GanttPRO vs TeamGantt 2026.

FAQ

Is Asana better than TeamGantt for small teams?

It depends on the workflow. Asana’s free plan caps at 2 users and excludes Timeline and dependencies — a 3-person team immediately needs the Starter tier at $10.99/user/month ($395.64/year). TeamGantt’s free plan gives 1 project to a single manager, which is also very limited. For a small team that plans by Gantt chart, TeamGantt Basic at $10/project/month is often cheaper and more purpose-fit than Asana Starter. For a team that needs automations and integrations, Asana wins despite the higher per-seat price.

Does TeamGantt charge per user?

No — TeamGantt uses per-project pricing, not per-seat. The Basic plan is $10/project/month (annual) and the Business plan is $19/project/month (annual). Each project tier includes a defined number of manager seats (1 on Basic, unlimited on Business), but collaborators — people who can view and update tasks — join at no extra charge. This makes TeamGantt particularly cost-effective for teams with large or changing headcounts.

Can I get a free Gantt chart from Asana or TeamGantt?

Neither tool’s free tier offers a truly usable Gantt experience. Asana’s free Personal plan excludes Timeline entirely. TeamGantt’s free plan allows 1 project with 40 tasks and 1 manager — functional for a solo trial but not for team use. GanttFather’s free tier includes your first project with 2 editor seats, unlimited free viewers, dependencies, and critical path at no cost.

Does Asana have better integrations than TeamGantt?

Yes, significantly. Asana lists 250+ native integrations covering Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Jira, Zoom, and more — all accessible starting at the Starter tier. TeamGantt’s integration list is much shorter; the most notable integration (Procore for construction) is gated behind the Builder Edition at $99–$199/month. If your team relies on a broad software stack, Asana’s integration breadth is a meaningful advantage.

Which tool has better critical path — Asana or TeamGantt?

Both offer critical path, but at different price points. TeamGantt Business includes critical path at $19/project/month (annual) alongside dependencies, time tracking, and workload management. Asana requires the Advanced tier at $24.99/user/month (annual) for critical path — on top of already paying Starter for the Timeline view. For teams where critical path is essential, TeamGantt Business is the more cost-efficient path when project count is low relative to team size.

What about automation — does TeamGantt have rules like Asana?

No — TeamGantt has no automation or rules engine at any tier. Asana’s Starter tier includes unlimited automations that trigger on field changes, status updates, task completion, and more. If workflow automation is a priority — automatically moving tasks, sending notifications, or creating subtasks based on triggers — Asana is the only option of these two.

References:

1. Asana. (2026). “Asana Pricing”.
2. TeamGantt. (2026). “TeamGantt Pricing”.
3. Asana. (2026). “Asana Features — Timeline”.
4. TeamGantt. (2026). “TeamGantt Features”.