TeamGantt is a strong Gantt-first tool for teams that value fast onboarding and project-based pricing. Its clean schedule, four dependency types, collaboration, and construction edition stand out; its free plan, project/task caps, and Business-tier gate on advanced controls are the main limitations.
Is TeamGantt good in 2026?
TeamGantt is a good Gantt-first project tool for teams that want a clean interface, quick onboarding, and pricing based mainly on active projects rather than every participant. TeamGantt’s strongest features are visual scheduling, four dependency types with lead/lag, collaboration, and specialized construction workflows. Its restrictive free plan and higher-tier scheduling controls are the main drawbacks.
Competitor disclosure: GanttFather competes with TeamGantt. This review uses TeamGantt’s public pricing and support documentation, receives no payment from TeamGantt, and states where TeamGantt is the better choice. Scores are GanttFather’s editorial assessment—not customer-review averages or a claim of independent laboratory testing.
Pricing and limits checked: August 7, 2026. TeamGantt offers monthly and annual billing and says annual payment saves nearly 20%. Taxes, promotions, localized prices, legacy subscriptions, and custom enterprise terms may differ.
What is TeamGantt best known for?
TeamGantt is best known for making traditional Gantt scheduling approachable to people who are not professional schedulers. Tasks sit beside a drag-and-drop timeline, and managers can add milestones, progress, dependencies, assignments, comments, and files without configuring a broad “work operating system.”
TeamGantt supports the four standard dependency relationships—finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, and start-to-finish—with custom lead or lag. That gives it more schedule expressiveness than basic timeline views. Higher tiers add critical path, baselines, workloads, portfolios, time tracking, and Kanban.
The product is especially interesting for organizations with a small number of active projects and many people who only update assigned work. Current paid packages scale primarily with projects, and TeamGantt distinguishes managers from collaborators: managers create and edit projects, while collaborators can update assigned tasks, progress, checklists, comments, and files.
How did TeamGantt score in this review?
TeamGantt earns an editorial score of 4.1 out of 5 for its target audience: small and midsize teams that want a focused cloud Gantt tool. The score falls when evaluated as a free tool or a broad enterprise work platform.
| Category | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 4.7/5 | Focused interface, drag-and-drop schedule, strong help material |
| Gantt depth | 4.3/5 | Four dependency types, lead/lag, milestones; advanced analysis is tiered |
| Collaboration | 4.1/5 | Clear manager/collaborator roles, comments, files, shared schedules |
| Resource and portfolio control | 3.8/5 | Useful workload and portfolio tools on Business; lighter entry tiers |
| Pricing value | 4.0/5 | Project-based bundles can favor collaborator-heavy teams; caps require modeling |
| Integrations and ecosystem | 3.5/5 | API, Zapier, calendar, Slack, Trello/Basecamp paths; narrower than work suites |
| Overall editorial score | 4.1/5 | Excellent focused fit, less compelling outside it |
The scores reflect fit, not feature count. A five-person agency may value the simple Gantt workflow more than hundreds of integrations. A company needing a wiki, chat, CRM, and service desk should compare a broader platform.
What does TeamGantt cost in 2026?
TeamGantt currently lists Free, Basic, Business, and Builder Edition options. The free plan is limited to one project and 40 tasks. Paid plans bundle projects, manager/collaborator capacity, and task limits rather than charging every viewer the same way a conventional per-seat suite does.
| Plan | Starting list price | Included project capacity | People and task limits | Notable scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1 project | 40 tasks; verify current user allowance in account | Basic hands-on Gantt use; 3 PDF exports; List and Calendar views are not available |
| Basic | $24/month | 2 projects | 1 manager, up to 10 collaborators, 150 tasks/project | Core Gantt, Calendar/List views, files, and project communication |
| Business | $120/month | 5 projects | Unlimited managers/collaborators, 500 tasks/project | Critical path, workload, portfolio, Kanban, time tracking, and advanced controls |
| Builder Edition | $199/month | 10 projects | Unlimited managers, collaborators, and tasks | Business plus lookaheads, Procore sync, RACI, schedule confirmation, forecasting, and other construction features |
TeamGantt says Basic can add projects for $12/month each up to five projects. Business can add projects for $24/month each up to 20. Annual billing is discounted by nearly 20%, so use the checkout quote—not a third-party calculator—for a final annual total.
The current public support pages do not present every Free-plan people limit in one clean matrix, so this review does not guess. The official pages clearly document one project, 40 tasks, and three Free PDF exports. Confirm manager/collaborator allowance in the signup flow before using Free for a team.
For a dedicated plan-limit analysis, see Is TeamGantt free? Current limits and pricing.
What does TeamGantt do especially well?
TeamGantt’s main strength is reducing the distance between a task list and a credible visual schedule. Four areas stand out.
Does TeamGantt make dependencies easy?
Yes. TeamGantt supports FS, SS, FF, and SF relationships with custom lead and lag. Its schedule can update as connected tasks move. This is genuine Gantt logic, not merely bars placed over dates.
Is TeamGantt easy for stakeholders to understand?
Yes. TeamGantt’s visual hierarchy, colors, progress, assignments, and milestones create a schedule that non-specialists can read. Public sharing and collaborator roles reduce the need to distribute a new PDF after every update.
Does TeamGantt work well for teams with many collaborators?
Often. Basic includes 10 collaborators, while Business includes unlimited managers and collaborators. This can be economical when a few active projects have many field staff, clients, or contributors but only a limited number of people build the schedule.
Is TeamGantt strong for construction?
Yes, for teams that fit its approach. Builder Edition adds lookahead scheduling, material-delay workflows, Procore sync, RACI assignments, lockable milestones, schedule-change confirmation, and financial forecasting. A construction firm should compare that workflow directly with Primavera P6, Microsoft Project, and its project-management suite rather than treating every Gantt tool as equivalent.
Where does TeamGantt fall short?
TeamGantt’s main limitations are tiering, fixed project/task packages, and a narrower surrounding ecosystem than all-in-one work platforms. Those limitations are reasonable product choices, but buyers need to price the plan that contains the features they will actually use.
- The free plan is small. One project and 40 tasks are suitable for learning or one modest plan, not a portfolio.
- Advanced controls require Business. TeamGantt’s pricing documentation places critical path, workload, portfolio management, Kanban, and time tracking in Business.
- Packages have task caps. Basic allows 150 tasks per project and Business 500. Large integrated schedules may outgrow those limits.
- Recurring and split tasks are constrained. TeamGantt support says recurring tasks require a workaround and a discontinuous activity must be represented as separate tasks.
- The broader work suite is lighter. TeamGantt does not try to replace a full document wiki, company chat, CRM, or service platform.
- Some help pages retain legacy plan names. Verify current entitlement in the live pricing page or a written sales quote when a support article references Pro, Standard, Advanced, or Unlimited Everything.
The last point is not evidence of a product problem; it is a procurement caution. The vendor is actively evolving packaging, and stale plan names can make older comparisons misleading.
How does TeamGantt compare with alternatives?
TeamGantt wins on approachable Gantt scheduling and project-based paid capacity; alternatives win when free cloud access, formal enterprise scheduling, knowledge management, or broader work consolidation is the priority.
| Product | Best reason to choose it | Main tradeoff versus TeamGantt |
|---|---|---|
| TeamGantt | Clean onboarding, four dependency types, collaborator-friendly project packages | Free and entry tiers limit projects, tasks, and advanced analysis |
| GanttFather | Free Gantt-first workflow, critical path, unlimited viewers/guests, Excel, MCP | Smaller ecosystem; no dedicated schedule-baseline overlay currently documented |
| GanttPRO | Dedicated scheduling with mature baseline and resource controls | No permanent free plan; pricing is generally per user |
| Microsoft Project | Deep scheduling, baselines, resource leveling, enterprise familiarity | Higher complexity and licensing cost |
| ClickUp | Broad all-in-one work suite at a low per-user starting price | Gantt Free has a non-resetting usage cap; interface is denser |
| GanttProject | Free open-source local scheduling and file ownership | No built-in real-time cloud collaboration in the desktop app |
Use GanttPRO vs TeamGantt for the focused dedicated-tool comparison, GanttProject vs TeamGantt for cloud versus desktop, and GanttFather vs TeamGantt for the current free-capacity decision.
Who should choose TeamGantt?
Choose TeamGantt when the schedule is central, the team wants fast adoption, and the project packages match the active portfolio. The best-fit organizations include:
- agencies running a few client projects with many collaborators;
- operations teams whose non-PM stakeholders need a readable chart;
- small construction teams that value Builder Edition’s specialized workflow;
- project managers who need four dependency types without Microsoft Project complexity;
- teams moving from spreadsheet Gantt files to a shared cloud schedule.
Skip or test alternatives when the project must stay entirely free beyond 40 tasks, when hundreds of projects must remain active, when every department needs docs and workflow automation, or when formal resource leveling and enterprise portfolio controls are mandatory.
When is GanttFather a better alternative to TeamGantt?
TeamGantt is better for polished onboarding, mature construction-specific features, and paid project bundles with many collaborators. GanttFather is better when free critical path, unlimited viewers and guests, Excel round-trip, and native MCP access matter.
GanttFather’s free tier includes one owned project with two editor seats and unlimited viewers and guests. FS, SS, FF, and SF dependencies with lag, critical path, Excel import/export, and real-time sharing are included in the app. TeamGantt has a more established brand, broader learning library, baseline tracking, and deeper Builder Edition; GanttFather has no dedicated baseline overlay or automatic resource leveling.
If two schedule editors can serve the wider project team and construction-specific controls are unnecessary, create a free GanttFather project and rebuild one representative TeamGantt phase before comparing daily usability.
Frequently asked questions
Is TeamGantt really free?
Yes, TeamGantt has a permanent Free plan, not only a trial. Current official support documentation limits it to one project and 40 tasks, with three PDF exports. List and Calendar views are not available on Free. Confirm the current people allowance in the account because the public pages are not fully synchronized.
How much does TeamGantt cost?
TeamGantt currently lists Basic from $24/month, Business from $120/month, and Builder Edition from $199/month. The packages begin with two, five, and ten projects respectively. TeamGantt offers monthly and annual billing and says annual billing saves nearly 20%; final pricing can vary by capacity and contract.
Does TeamGantt support all four dependency types?
Yes. TeamGantt’s current scheduling material documents finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, and start-to-finish dependencies, plus custom lead and lag. This is one of TeamGantt’s strongest advantages over lightweight timeline products that only offer a generic blocking link.
Does TeamGantt have critical path and baselines?
Yes, but plan availability matters. TeamGantt’s current subscription overview places critical path and other advanced controls in Business. The vendor’s product material also documents baseline tracking. Confirm the exact tier in the live plan matrix before purchase, especially if a support article uses a legacy plan name.
Can clients collaborate in TeamGantt?
Yes. Collaborators can be assigned tasks, receive notifications, update progress and checklists, comment, and exchange files. Basic includes up to 10 collaborators; Business and Builder include unlimited collaborators. Apply the least privilege needed and test what a real external user sees before opening a client project.
Is TeamGantt good for large enterprises?
TeamGantt can support substantial teams, especially through Business, Builder, and custom arrangements. An enterprise PMO should still test project/task caps, identity controls, audit needs, portfolio depth, integration requirements, resource leveling, and contractual support. Ease of use does not replace governance requirements.
Sources
