Asana vs monday.com comparison for 2026, checked on 18 October. Compare current pricing, Gantt, dependencies, critical path, baselines, collaboration, and GanttFather.
Asana vs monday.com: what is the short answer?
Choose Asana when your priority is a broad work-management platform, with portfolios, many integrations, and several views around the schedule. Choose monday.com when your priority is configurable boards and project views in one work platform, with a large integration catalogue. Neither is universally better: the decisive questions are who needs to edit the schedule, whether critical path and baselines are required, and whether the surrounding workflow should be a focused scheduler or a broader work platform.
Checked on 18 October 2026: Prices and plan details below were checked against the vendors’ official pricing, product, and help pages. Prices are USD list prices for annual billing unless stated otherwise; taxes, promotions, regions, legacy plans, and negotiated contracts can differ.
How do Asana and monday.com compare now?
| Decision point | Asana | monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Free access | Personal is free for up to 2 users, with unlimited tasks and projects, but it has no Timeline, Gantt, or task dependencies. | The Free plan is for up to 2 seats and 3 boards, and it has no Gantt view. |
| Current starting price | Starter is $10.99 per user/month billed annually ($13.49 monthly). Advanced is $24.99 billed annually ($30.49 monthly). | Standard is $12 and Pro is $19 per seat/month billed annually ($14 and $24 monthly). Paid plans start from 3 seats. |
| Gantt availability | Timeline and Gantt views are included on Starter and higher plans. | The Gantt view needs Standard or higher. |
| Dependencies | Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans, not on Personal. | The Dependency column needs Pro or Enterprise; cross-project dependencies are Enterprise only. |
| Critical path | Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans. | Critical path needs Pro or Enterprise, and monday.com still labels it a trial feature. |
| Baselines | Check Asana’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy. | Check monday.com’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy. |
| Collaboration model | Paid plans have no seat cap, Portfolios come with Advanced, and Asana lists 100+ free integrations. | Work is organized in configurable boards; monday.com says it has 850+ integrations, and Standard includes 250 integration actions a month. |
The table separates a visible timeline from formal schedule controls. A product can show dated bars while placing dependencies, critical path, or baseline comparison on a higher tier. That distinction matters more than whether a marketing page simply says “Gantt.”
Figures and their sources
Asana
| Figure | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan (Personal) | Up to 2 users; no Timeline, Gantt or task dependencies | Asana pricing |
| Starter (Gantt and dependencies) | $10.99 per user per month billed annually, $13.49 monthly | Asana pricing |
| Critical path | Advanced and above, from $24.99 per user per month billed annually | Asana pricing |
| Rating | 4.5 out of 5 from 13,764 reviews | GetApp |
monday.com
| Figure | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Up to 2 seats and 3 boards, without Gantt | monday.com pricing |
| Gantt view | Standard and up: $12 per seat per month billed annually, 3 seats minimum | monday.com pricing |
| Critical path | Pro and Enterprise only | monday.com help: Gantt |
| Rating | 4.6 out of 5 from 6,123 reviews | GetApp |
Checked on .
When is Asana the better choice?
Asana is the stronger fit when the priority is a broad work-management platform, with portfolios, many integrations, and several views around the schedule. Paid plans have no seat cap, Portfolios come with Advanced, and Asana lists 100+ free integrations.
The main qualification is equally important. Formal schedulers should account for the Advanced-tier critical-path gate: Starter shows the Gantt chart and dependencies, but not the critical path.
Choose Asana if: its surrounding workflow matters as much as the chart, its current plan limits match the real editor group, and the team has tested one representative project rather than comparing feature names alone.
When is monday.com the better choice?
monday.com is the stronger fit when the priority is configurable boards and project views in one work platform, with a large integration catalogue. Work is organized in configurable boards; monday.com says it has 850+ integrations, and Standard includes 250 integration actions a month.
The tradeoff is not hidden. A Standard buyer can see a Gantt chart but needs Pro for dependencies and critical path, and the 3-seat minimum can bill more seats than a very small team uses.
Choose monday.com if: its pricing unit matches how the team works, its scheduling tier contains every required control, and the product’s collaboration model fits internal and external participants.
What does the price comparison look like for 10 people?
- Asana: For 10 paid users, Starter is $1,318.80/year. Advanced is $2,998.80/year and is the first tier with critical path.
- monday.com: For 10 seats billed annually, Standard is $1,440/year and Pro, the first tier with dependencies and critical path, is $2,280/year.
Those figures are not automatically like-for-like. A free viewer, collaborator, guest, manager, or desktop user can have different permissions in each product. Compare the smallest group that must actually create tasks, change dates, restructure dependencies, and administer the schedule—not the total number of people who may open a link.
For procurement, model at least three cases: the current editor count, the editor count after one year, and the number of simultaneously active projects. Then confirm the result in each vendor’s checkout because seat minimums, project add-ons, and regional pricing can change the total.
Which product has the stronger Gantt scheduling model?
Asana: Timeline and Gantt views are included on Starter and higher plans. Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans, not on Personal. Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans. Check Asana’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy.
monday.com: The Gantt view needs Standard or higher. The Dependency column needs Pro or Enterprise; cross-project dependencies are Enterprise only. Critical path needs Pro or Enterprise, and monday.com still labels it a trial feature. Check monday.com’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy.
A stronger schedule model is not always the better product. A team may rationally accept lighter Gantt controls in exchange for automation, documents, dashboards, or ecosystem fit. Conversely, a project manager who recalculates handoffs daily should not buy a broad platform merely because it can display a timeline.
What should you test before choosing?
- Import or rebuild one real project with at least 30 tasks.
- Create the dependency types the project actually uses, including lag if relevant.
- Move a predecessor and confirm how successors react.
- Display critical path and a baseline using the tier you intend to buy.
- Invite one scheduler, one contributor, and one read-only stakeholder.
- Export the schedule in the format your clients or PMO require.
- Price the exact number of paid editors and active projects at checkout.
This test exposes permission, scale, and plan-limit differences that a marketing comparison cannot.
When is GanttFather a better fit than Asana or monday.com?
GanttFather fits a Gantt-first project with up to two editors and many reviewers. It is free for 1 project you own, with 2 editors and unlimited free viewers. Each extra project is US$5 a month (US$2.50 a month billed yearly), and an extra editor seat is US$2 a month (US$1 a month billed yearly). No feature is locked to a paid plan: FS/SS/FF/SF dependencies with lag and lead, critical path, Gantt, List, and Board views, Excel import and export, PDF and PNG reports, live updates, and an MCP server for AI assistants.
The limits: GanttFather has no baselines, no comments, and no resource leveling (workload is only a count of active tasks per person), it runs only in the browser, and dependencies are not part of its Excel import and export. Asana or monday.com can be the better purchase when those capabilities or a larger ecosystem outweigh the price difference.
Create a free GanttFather project and reproduce one dependency-heavy phase before deciding. For direct product pages, see GanttFather vs Asana and GanttFather vs monday.com.
Frequently asked questions
Is Asana or monday.com cheaper?
It depends on paid editors, active projects, and the feature tier. Asana: For 10 paid users, Starter is $1,318.80/year. Advanced is $2,998.80/year and is the first tier with critical path. monday.com: For 10 seats billed annually, Standard is $1,440/year and Pro, the first tier with dependencies and critical path, is $2,280/year. Compare the exact checkout totals rather than multiplying a headline price that may use a different team-size band or project bundle.
Which one has a usable free Gantt chart?
Asana: Personal is free for up to 2 users, with unlimited tasks and projects, but it has no Timeline, Gantt, or task dependencies. monday.com: The Free plan is for up to 2 seats and 3 boards, and it has no Gantt view. “Free” should be evaluated with its usage, task, project, and collaboration limits—not just account creation.
Which one supports dependencies?
Asana: Task dependencies are available on Starter and higher plans, not on Personal. monday.com: The Dependency column needs Pro or Enterprise; cross-project dependencies are Enterprise only.
Which one supports critical path?
Asana: Critical path is available on Advanced and higher plans. monday.com: Critical path needs Pro or Enterprise, and monday.com still labels it a trial feature.
Which one supports baselines?
Asana: Check Asana’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy. monday.com: Check monday.com’s current help pages for baseline support on the plan you would buy.
How should a team migrate between them?
Export the smallest representative project first, preserve a copy of the source data, and validate task hierarchy, dates, dependency types, lag, assignees, comments, and custom fields after import. No cross-vendor migration preserves every permission, automation, dashboard, or integration, so budget time for manual reconstruction and acceptance testing.
Sources
